Home › Learn › Qualified vs ordinary dividends

Qualified vs ordinary dividends

Two investors can receive the identical dividend from the identical company and pay very different tax on it. The difference comes down to a holding-period test — and the clock is measured around the ex-dividend date.

The two categories

US tax law splits dividends in two:

• Qualified dividends are taxed at the long-term capital gains rates — 0%, 15% or 20%, depending on your taxable income. Higher earners may also owe the 3.8% net investment income tax on top.
• Ordinary (non-qualified) dividends are taxed as ordinary income, at whatever your marginal rate happens to be.

For someone in a high bracket the gap between the two treatments is substantial — potentially more than a third of the payment. Yet the qualified/ordinary split is not something the company decides on your behalf. It depends on both what kind of payer it is and what you personally did with the shares.

Test one: the payer

To be capable of being qualified, the dividend generally has to come from a US corporation, or from a qualified foreign corporation — which broadly means one incorporated in a US possession, one eligible under a US tax treaty, or one whose shares trade on an established US securities market.

Several common income investments are structurally excluded, and this catches people out:

• REITs. Most REIT distributions are ordinary income, because the REIT itself hasn't paid corporate tax on the money. Part of a REIT distribution may instead be classified as return of capital or capital gain.
• Business development companies and many other pass-through structures, for the same reason.
• Money market funds and bond funds — those distributions are interest, not dividends, whatever the platform calls them.
• Master limited partnerships, which distribute rather than pay dividends and come with a K-1 instead of a 1099.

Notably, the two categories of payer most likely to pay monthly — REITs and BDCs — are exactly the ones whose distributions usually aren't qualified. Of the ~1,600 US payers we track, the 8% that pay monthly are heavily concentrated in these structures.

Test two: how long you held — the 61-day rule

This is the part that depends on you, and it is measured against the ex-dividend date.

For common stock, you must hold the shares for more than 60 days during the 121-day period that begins 60 days before the ex-dividend date.

Read that carefully, because the window is symmetric around the ex-date. It opens 60 days before the ex-date and closes 60 days after. You need more than 60 days of holding somewhere inside that 121-day span. You do not have to hold continuously, and you do not have to have held before the ex-date at all — buying shortly after and holding for a couple of months can satisfy it.

For preferred stock, where the dividend is attributable to a period longer than 366 days, the test is longer: more than 90 days during the 181-day period beginning 90 days before the ex-date.

Days on which your risk of loss was reduced — for example by holding an offsetting short position or certain options — don't count toward the total.

Who fails the test

The obvious casualty is anyone trading around the ex-date. A dividend capture trade — buy just before the ex-date, sell shortly after — is almost designed to fail the 61-day test. The dividend arrives taxed as ordinary income, which erodes a large part of the point of the trade, on top of the ex-date price drop and transaction costs.

The less obvious casualty is someone who sells a long-held position shortly after an ex-date having bought it only recently. If you bought two weeks before the ex-date and sold two weeks after, you held for around 28 days inside the window — not enough — even though you owned the shares on the qualifying date and definitely received the dividend.

This is why knowing ex-dividend dates in advance has a tax dimension as well as a trading one. If you are planning to buy or sell near one, the ex-date is the reference point for a clock you may not want to start on the wrong side of. Our announcement and ex-dividend calendar and per-stock pages give you our estimate of when the company will next announce, often weeks before it does, and the confirmed ex-date itself as soon as it declares.

What your broker reports

At year end your broker issues Form 1099-DIV. Box 1a shows total ordinary dividends; box 1b shows the portion that is qualified. Box 1b is a subset of box 1a, not an addition to it.

Brokers apply the holding-period test based on the trades they can see, and generally do it correctly for a straightforward account. They cannot see positions you hold elsewhere, and complex situations — hedges, options overlays, transfers between institutions mid-year — are where the reported figure and the correct figure can drift apart.

A further wrinkle: some distributions are reclassified after year end, particularly from REITs and funds, which is why corrected 1099s in February and March are common. Filing early on a first-issue 1099 that later gets amended is a familiar annoyance.

Where it doesn't matter

Inside a tax-advantaged retirement account, the distinction is irrelevant — dividends aren't taxed as they're received, so the qualified/ordinary split has no effect. This is one reason investments that throw off non-qualified income, like REITs, are often deliberately placed in those accounts and kept out of taxable ones.

The bottom line

Two conditions have to hold for the lower rate: the payer has to be eligible, and you have to clear the 61-day window measured around the ex-dividend date. The first is a fact about the company. The second is a consequence of your own timing — and it is the one that short holding periods routinely break.

Related reading: the four dividend dates · dividend capture · how dividends work.

This article is general educational information about US federal tax rules and is not tax advice. Rates, thresholds and rules change, and individual circumstances differ — consult a qualified tax professional about your own position.